Our decisions are published as part of our commitment to being open and transparent. The decisions are anonymised so residents’ names are not used, but landlords are named. The decisions date from December 2020, and are published 3 months after the final decision date. In some cases, we may decide not to publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest or the resident’s anonymity may be compromised. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
The resident complains about: How the landlord handled her request for rehousing on medical grounds, including its communication and the time taken for her to be rehoused. How the landlord responded to her reports that dust from a neighbouring development was entering the property and affecting the health of her and her family.
The complaint is about:
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to a repair issue with the resident’s boiler.
The complaint is about the level of compensation the landlord offered following a fire alarm repair.
The complaint is about:
The resident has complained that the landlord has taken too long to resolve their reports of subsidence at the building where they live, and offered insufficient compensation in its response.
The complaint concerns: The landlord’s response to the resident’s request for a partial refund of the water charges she had paid since the start of her tenancy. The landlord’s complaint handling.
The complaint is about the landlord’s proposed decision to install a particular type of sprinkler system in sheltered accommodation in the borough.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s: Reports of leaks to his garage roof and shed downpipe. Reports of overflowing gutters, and the wrong repair to his balcony. Subsequent complaint handling.
This complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of anti-social behaviour (‘ASB’) by her neighbours. The report will also address the landlord’s handling of the complaint.