All our decisions are published here as part of our commitment to being open and transparent. The decisions are anonymised so residents’ names are not used, but landlords are named. The decisions date from December 2020 and are published three months after the final decision date. In some cases we may decide not to publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest or the resident’s anonymity may be compromised. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
This complaint is about the landlords handling of the resident’s: Reports of overgrown trees depositing debris in his garden. Reports of boiler repairs in October 2020. Request for assistance with the costs of home improvements/disability adaptations. Subsequent formal complaint. Reports of the effects the boiler and tree issues had on his health.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of floor and ceiling repairs and response to reports of damage to the resident’s belongings.
REPORT COMPLAINT 202100770 Notting Hill Genesis 30 September 2021 Our approach The Housing Ombudsman’s approach to investigating and determining complaints is to decide what is fair in all the circumstances of the case. This is […]
The complaint concerns the landlord’s response to: The residents’ request for an independent surveyor assessment. The residents’ reports of defects to the communal areas. The residents’ complaint about its poor communication and management of the property. The residents’ concerns raised about the NHBC warranty.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of: An operative attending the resident’s property without authorisation. The operative’s conduct.
The resident complained about the landlord’s response to reports about the condition of the property including: Boiler. Windows. Kitchen. External doors. Bathroom.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s handling of the resident’s application for a mutual exchange. The landlord’s decision to not allocate the proposed property to the resident following the collapse of the mutual exchange.
The complaint concerns: the landlord’s response to reports of a water leak from the overflow pipe. The landlord’s complaint handling.
This complaint is about the level of redress the landlord offered following the resident’s complaint that it granted unauthorised access to his flat.
The resident complains about: The landlord’s response to his report of repairs needed at the property which he considers should have been identified by the landlord’s mutual exchange inspection. How the landlord handled the formal complaint.